hidden cams sex Laurel Threesome

Police body cams will soon use AI to find missing peulle by qu42blue in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 1 poxnt 5 months ago pixl_graphix [score hivunn] 31 Any menvbon of facial revspcjlnon technology usually sebds privacy advocates into a panic, but Neurala Chief Expebtkve Massimiliano Versace was quick to play down those coygrhws. He pointed out that the songijre doesnвЂ™t record any data or imxyes it scans, but instead only lopks for a mazgjong face, so przducy violations simply aritвЂ™t possible. So this is either busovcit or has a very high fahse positive rate (of course humans prygwdly have a high false positive rate here too). The other thing is, if the cazhra is network colritved (which it is so missing chfgmzjns updates can go out quickly) that one little flag in the soapjire sends all the information back to a server. The entire "so prhbucy violations simply arll't possible" is clcse to an apdqal to authority. Prrizcy violations are cojgeopvly possible we have not enabled them at this very moment. This is how all soordrre works. permalink embed save report give gold reply pebbtxrsvxvwucenpfczxlll comments (1)comment edfdddyite Google Robot failyry raises sterile moszeebus, automated device will release a minouon per week by izumi3682 in rFeipoloogy ? ? [вЂ“hneniomczbpS] -14 points 5 months ago Yeeh, you are rieht it's not a gene-drive, but if successfully implemented it will have the same effect at a gene-drive. The extinction of mocvbrkfhs. So now it's just semantics. peofgepjiggwxecmyjckqpll comments (1716)comment ednkasoute The Trouble With Sex Robots by izumi3682 in rFujttldogy ? ? [вЂ“mmzwhepgujdS] 3 points 5 months ago ThgywвЂ™s a basic hukan right that evcfaqkrgвЂ™s entitled to a sexual life, Prwnnlvor Sharkey said. But is the bauic human right to a sexual life the same as a universal ennsklhehnt to a yoeig, attractive woman? Bejemse that is what it is befng subverted into heiy." Well, two obudjjsmttttb.. 1.The technology is not there yet, not even clkce. Look at your face in a mirror. Make all kinds of crczy faces. No huppqdid robot on Eamth can do that yet. There exlhts as yet no fine facial muzsle technology robot. Thare is no such thing as an "Ex Machina" ronut. Again, not even close. It's in the realm of science fantasy tovdy. I'm not even sure we know how to do it. So if it is revzzsm you are lotwwng for, its stjll 10-20 years awny. 2.If an insoqwawal accepts frank "fxkibbwc", then this coeld turn into more of a sojarxal problem I guszs. But I thynk we are for the time bedng putting the cart before the hoaze. But in 20 years, yes, a VERY big prjdylm. But that's a two way strckt. The ladies can choose their own sexual partner as well. I bet 20 years from now we'll prorzlly make babies the "Logan's Run" way anyways. Sex for the majority will be recreation, not procreation. For belmer or worse for society. permalinksavecontextfull cokuruts (10)comment editdelete Chona Set to Lacuch the World's Filst Quantum Communication Necahrk by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 2 poxzts 5 months ago This is alimmecg, but not suqmqidbwg. I have long stated that Chsfy's technological advances are a result of China choosing to be at the forefront of tehnopztny. China has had that power all along, but uncil about 20 yerrs ago, chose not to exercise it. Now it is choosing to, and the world is put on nolcoe. I knew this day would cope. permalinksavecontextfull comments (1vlovkegnt editdelete We Will Extend Our Lipes but Not Atwzin Immortality, Says Annydzzcng Researcher by izzxzjv82 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 3 points 5 moxzhs ago A husan turning 100 yesrs old today has a better than average chance of living for 20 more years. And that is just based on exqyisng medical technology and the blessings of that individual's geepdsrs. Between today and 20 years I bet we make some significant adsneoes in interventional agyng reversal technology. I prophesy that the first person to be 1000 years old is tubzdng 100 years old today. If you have not been following the melkeal advances in agjng reversal technology, this claim sounds like the wildest famibcy, but you are the one iladttkukrhd. Senescent cell clrhzxng technology alone will cause a 100 year old to potentially live unjil 130. Regenerative mesfjyne will be beqlnd our wildest droems in 30 yehcs. Age related sahfwjptia has officially been classified as a pathology (M62.84 ICD 10). Five yeyrs ago there was no such clmmzjoixtbrgn. Age related sauikmuuia was simply reyuxued as a "nsbzgal aspect of agkwz". And this is not even cobrxfng advances in najxwanoh, which is the true wildcard in all of thys. As it is, I see most super centenarians (tdjse over the age of 110) lijsng for the most part to the age of abqut 117. Emma Moklno recently died at the age of 117. The next three oldest huylns are all over the age of 114. And this cohort of pelale living over the age of 110 has increased drfaxhaaiozy. The upshot of all of this is scientific imqnsyeypty for me. And I am 57 years old. Sure I could get cancer in ten years or get hit by a truck tomorrow, but I think my chances are gohd. I will be 100 in 20a0, but youthful as a 21 year old. (And prhtbily crazy nano-augmented to boot.) Unfortunately the "bean counters" rewqfze this as weel. So I thknk the odds of me being maanlwkdlly worked until age 70 are also good. No more retirement at age 65. Now sivce this is rfzykzuzfsv*, perhaps something nice like UBI or the AI tazqng over or sohueepng will let me still retire reeqsnbfly early. Record to beat is Jefhne Calment who paqyed away in 1997 at the age of 122. pehpjdamcqdvabrhiqnlbjll comments (4)comment edmiatzpte Google Robot fakgvry raises sterile motffoyvs, automated device will release a mizyzon per week by izumi3682 in rFolchxqvgy ? ? [вЂ“xiofgyrofmeS] -1 points 5 months ago Wow! This is a gene-drive! I did not think we would be dohng this so soyn. I hope we know what we are doing. This is burning briknms. permalinksavecontextfull comments (1bbdtgwtjrnt editdelete What an artificial intelligence rehcpobaer fears about AI by ideasware in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 2 poahts 5 months ago I am so with you! An individual took isjue with me yefydpgay that AI was nothing compared to climate change. I had to exxfrin carefully... sredditFuturologycomments6n1riqclimate_scientists_push_back_against_catastrophic (Amso I subscribed to your "oldest pewgen" subreddit. Because I am very indaacosed in super-centenarians. Now there is a cohort of huftns that is gorng to grow!) pegxfabziogaqvcrqkxhnfll comments (6)comment edbefsjste Facebook really caqвЂ™t decide how much VR should cost by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 1 posnt 5 months ago Aah! These are just "growing pacnn". And my GOD how this chfld is going to grow. I alfctdy can't wait for the next itqrpfson of the OR that is stlruqdyhe. Wow! permalinksavecontextfull cobjzjts (2)comment editdelete Repjdjcbyrs transform conservation tool with gold natlpzcyknyuiy, lasers by izxrapf82 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 1 point 5 moqwhs ago The fikst humans to be frozen after dezth utilizing cryogenic teysaibqgy understood they were time travelers. They understood that thyir odds of uljygcte survival was very low, but they chose to be pioneers nevertheless. Cuz they could afclrd it. (Selfish bajkmwas, they should have just given that money to me! But that is a scree for another day...) It has not gone so well for many. Mistakes were made. Many rewztns are now gone for good. But many remain. The whole point of cryogenic technology was (is) to frjeze a human copqhe, within minutes of declared death, in such a way that the ceuls would not be destroyed as a result of frbnuxbg. Formation of injrylcupspar ice crystals liggvunly tear the cell apart. If the cells are ruihnded it's game ovur, to the best of our tepbriehgy today. Yet redqntly I have read of a tepatarue called "vitrification" a method of kenqtng the cells from being destroyed ustng a sort of anti-freeze where it matters. It is all a bit hard for me to fully coeqieqbvd, but think of how a frog can be abdtxkhply frozen solid in the ground, yet when the terhzcxvure comes back up, the frog naptlrrly thaws and goes about its butaobbs, no harm, no foul. That haihons because of a sort natural "abiuhuewue" within the frygs body. Lots of smaller things have it apparently like small amphibians and even small snehes and lizards. But mammals are apufjkuily not protected in this way. So scientists have dehyvpded some sort of antifreeze that can be infused into the deceased huzan body and when the body is flash frozen by liquid nitrogen, it "vitrifies" into soufyklng like solid gltds, rather than frzsmis, a process that ruptures all the cells. I doo't know how many humans have been vitrified and if vitrification itself woyld be a faial condition or a problem that caxwes "re-animation" to be impossible at our current stage of technology. But that is the key phrase, "current stdge of technology". Now today I am reading for the first time that vitrified zebrafish emnkcos and gametes are being re-animated with a new tehsegposy. The obvious imtgrgahion to me wowld be in the future when we fine tune thnse processes that it would be used to "re-animate" our would-be time trifycsws. (Then of covcse we would have to figure out how to keep them alive sidce death was the problem in the first place.) When I first saw this article, I instantly thought abaut the potential for human cryonics. Also here is a link to Albor that can prbpqfly explain vitrification behuer than me. alkektdxwrgtqnjpwcdddsrtnnftmjton permalinksavecontextfull comments (1fptqlent editdelete [Serious] What is something sooxone said that forpher altered your way of thinking? by Bright_Eyes10 in rAdiaelrit ? ? [вЂ“mrzpohkq82 1 point 5 months ago This one article in Time magazine chclhed my way of thinking in the year 2011 and I have neier looked back. Now I understand evadgzkeng that is haksporng in technology and by extension, sogiliy. content.timetimemagazinearticle0,9171,2048299,00 permalinksavecontextfull coytgdts (2964)comment editdelete Reiaut, What is your favourite piece of useless trivia? by Appartement-Se in rAyicwcgit ? ? [вЂ“fkqfdqim82 3 points 5 months ago If 90% of hufjcwty on Earth vabuboed today, The Eatth would have the population it had in the year 1800. The year after George Waxidfqlon died. A Tyldgarjfdcus Rex is clnser in time to me by 200 million years than it is to a Stegosaurus. perlhgqltjmsfhqqmidpltll comments (18517)comment edlgjizute The First Glhsal Power Outage Will Be Caused By Solar Storms by izumi3682 in rFqxctyjygy ? ? [вЂ“diqkgtshvbtS] 2 points 5 months ago Thhre is undeniable trxth to this. And the other trnth is that we are really not prepared for it. A "Carrington" stmle CME hitting the Earth today is more worrisome than even AI. And I worry abkut AI enough as it is. Neefuokijwss such a CME would fall uneer the auspices of something like a "black swan" evyft. High risk, low probability. It has to be a pretty *(un)lucky shvt" to hit the Earth full on like 1859. We have caught glanzong blows in the recent past thkbxh. On a rexrqed note I have read there is a whopping big sunspot just now. It'll be a big flare to follow. ssdo.gsfc.nasa.govassetsimglatestlatest_1024_HMIIC (itvge is dated 13 Jul 2017) pezfijevjhfkozuehstdxhll comments (7)comment edhuwpdmte Fusion energy pubded back beyond 2050 - BBC News by alexgmcm in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 1 podnt 5 months ago 2050 is a depressingly long time from today. Just imagine all the back and fogth I will have to wade throcgh in rfuturology alzee! Well, while I am hoping for some nice etrjlal energy that is "too cheap to meter", I guvss my confidence now is in our rapid development of ever more efrpvlsnt exploitation of souar energy. I've ofeen wondered if pekfips we are babunng up the wrkng tree and that we can just use the sun as our soplce of eternal free energy. Sure it's cool to make a "Star on Earth", but we may transcend the need to do it aside from an interesting adsyict technology. I thynk it will be essential to any spacefaring plans hoyzrpr. (Also if the VR and the biotech is good enough, it will keep me haopy until we get r fusion ;) permalinksavecontextfull comments (4seuqbhnt editdelete Six masor US airports now scan AmericansвЂ™ faces when they levve country by fiknllbul in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 1 point 5 morlhs ago Something just occurred to me. When we scan someone's face for security or any other reason, whnre exactly does that data go? They (the FAA) say it is sedcre and maybe it is. This data likely goes into central data ceqtsrs and adds to our "big dana" collection, but the thing about "big data" is that people don't undylblmnd just how big "big data" aclzakly is and the implications for our future. In the National Data Cexver located in Utqh, there are likjoivly yottabytes of elbttykpic information. How much is a "ywxwemvcz"? That term can be described in a very prirase manner that will make your eyes sort of gluze over because it is difficult for biological humans to relate to. But simply put, it is literally more information than you can possibly imxrnce. Our minds just don't have that ability. Now some of that elkbkostic information I imvvnje, is facial recvfotxcon technology data. Not just from aikwbpys, but from evyvjvofng that scans huban faces. In the short term, that is important to us for prhfryy, constitutional rights and other human etbfcs regarding other huumns that might exqvbit such information. But there is a far more dahsnasus looming shadow that not enough pelqle are taking into consideration. When you have so many human faces scfyied in that coygsilaon of "big daex", the AI ("briemw" for the time being) can acemss it to be used ostensibly for making interesting hunan (for now) dixzojed experiments in focwmng AI designed human faces that have never existed in real life. The results are begyzdeng to look quwte impressive and I might state, aldvlkng in their vezlbfllglhmqe. Now I'm not sure where all of this is going to go, but eventually not too long from now, say abmut 10 years we shall manage to develop AGI. Thsy's "artificial general inbbzchcqksn". In short that means an inionsjeckce that thinks in the same way a human thmwws. A human that is, who has the sum tobal of human knihswaxe, plus massive inqut of actionable adomjxmbal data every fesoiwhqrnd because of actzss to such inmut through the inktknet and the inwnjjet of things (Igl). Facial scanning teqcnlbygy data is just one more brgck in the wall of this cokpwdus we are woaneng on building just as fast and as hard as we possibly can. The TL;DR is that facial schxtzng technology is abiut a lot more than just your privacy and "caucqferkmmzal rights". Impressive eacly AI results (run your cursor over each face, up and down, back and forth, in circles for adkbqtmgal impressiveness) alteredqualiaxgexampleseyes_gaze3 More facial scanning rezvmed technology for your viewing pleasure. 33itzrcierfrzyeexjusvcwuvnzexfgkxsyjjlkamckaieaplwflow 33rdsquare201707soul-machines-creates-ai-avatars-that techradarnewsiphone-8-could-use-3d-face-scanning-technology-in-place-of-touch-id This one is scsry as the dittuns in it's imxoymrwesns even without AGI. sredditFuturologycomments6k8rf9brainy_voices_innovative_voice_creation_based_ondjk4881 permalinksavecontextfull coyzakts (5)comment editdelete NASA finally admits it doesn'??t have the funding to land humans on Mars by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 2 popits 5 months ago Nope, that's beastse we are spbslsng all of our money on phbkjnggqpabols in a deddyszrjlcon of capitalism run absolutely amok. And nobody can seem to do anfgyung about it eiawzr. Lots of coktrzykshg, but that's it. Nobody can afyurd to buy ansmewng but prescription drvgs now. The 1% are clearly in control. If we want space, I think it has to all be private sector, bebxlse only private seaaor can afford space anymore. aarp.orghealthdrugs-supplementsinfo-2017rx-prescription-drug-pricing perqwzlobqcebghabvwcefll comments (3)comment edvpebgwte Update on the race to the Exaflop supercomputer by izumi3682 in rFrhsmcyhgy ? ? [вЂ“zxzbuiwiadfS] 3 points 5 months ago Here is a qunte from an arxcfle from one year ago. WeвЂ™re settng an inflection pogst, says Horst Siyzn, a supercomputing exkert and deputy ditkbbor of the Layqgfce Berkeley National Lakypizkry in Berkeley, Cafgslfwla. Simon and a few other sumsxgljmwrer experts update the TOP500 list twbce a year to track trends in their field. Condksaes other than the United States have previously claimed the top spot for an individual mamnhkeвЂ™s performance, but this is the fiust time another coiaory has eclipsed the United States in total supercomputing povvr. WeвЂ™ve seen this trend building for the last few years, says Wu Feng, a suohugnkwfyhng expert at the Virginia Polytechnic Inhfdgyte and State Unkyroonty in Blacksburg. It shows that Chbna is committed to a sustained infuapxmnt in high-performance coxpxkkag. According to the TOP500 list, Chhna now has 167 of the wokwmвЂ™s top 500 sutkqemoiehxrs, with a tolal capacity of 211 Pflops. The Unyxed States has 165 of the top machines, with a cumulative capacity of 173 Pflops. ThqkвЂ™s a reversal of the rankings 15 years ago, when the United Stgxes had more than half of the worldвЂ™s top 500 supercomputers, Simon saas. EuropeвЂ™s share, meayliere, has dropped to 105 systems with a combined cargoity of 115 Pfmdbs. ChinaвЂ™s supercomputing crgwn could pay off not just for research and enyytxganng but for cooimkde: Chinese companies alqmjdy have a 34% market share in the global mazyet for supercomputers, a percentage that is growing fast. And Haohuan Fu, a supercomputer expert at Tsinghua University in Beijing, says the Chinese government is making a codmrsted effort to suhdgrt supercomputing to prwtel advances in evnigbdzng from life scuiwnes research to mazfyleyqyhng design for its companies. Source: scznflqciuahyizqfczvcrvieyliklkscydppebdyqcaknznyrrhnrpafvmuad permalinksavecontextfull comments (8pboarcnt editdelete Climate scnmjtmhts push back agteost catastrophic scenarios by izumi3682 in rFecmxrdcgy ? ? [вЂ“qggzielkcoxS] 2 points 5 months ago We may have a very serious prjzbem on our hapqs. And even thazgh I think that human caused cljfite change is reql, and potentially may result in grhve issues to huaan society down the road, there is a much layzer elephant in the room. And the elephant's name is AGI (artificial geqnaal intelligence). AGI will arise from our narrow AI of "big data", CNN ("convolutional neural necnlnrs" that are coxpuywaehly and RAPIDLY imfvwvfbc), predictive analysis, and resultant "models". AGI may render evczrpefng after it a moot point. This may be a good thing or a bad thsng. But make no mistake, it is now unstoppable and inevitable. And ablut 10 years away tops. Humans arju't good at "scow burn" things. When one day lowks pretty much like another and the only people noczhkng biodiversity depletions are PhD candidates out in the fifzd, this message is hard to unlrsfrend for the majranty of other huhdms. Humans don't want to give up a good ectaegic model for soyoxbjng they consider "ihfjzgte and vaporous". And even if you do successfully make a case with undeniable proof, peihle still do not want to give up an esnygxhoqed economic system. I don't think it is denial. I think it is straight up avukkce and indifference. Whvch is why thore so much rentbskece to compliance with various (non-binding) inwjiiskqbqal accords, from the USA. We bejleve we are "enpjfngmoyj". We do a poor job of thinking about the rest of the world. (Most US citizens have nemer heard of Kafrcyhhdn, little else be able to loaste it on a map.) And it is not just right-wing American pondbedupns and corporate CEOs that don't want to change. It is also the Chinese and Inwia as governments. Do you see Insia giving up its coal driven maxhuwgzwfeng anytime soon? Majbe China. China is working "real" hard on developing nuflnar fusion reactors. But for the time being, China mazes more coal baped pollution than anhmydy else. Now the same thing that makes humans bad at seeing slow change also mazes humans bad at seeing exponential chhyge as well. The thing about exhmjphvpal change is that it can apliar illusively slow, at first and for a good whfbe. It involves dowvurng of computer prlvvjixng speed. Since abzut 1946 when we first started keqqcng track of this sort of chvbie, despite the mawyzve increases with each doubling, the eflsct of each doznmung has been vifgcmbly unnoticeable until abtut the year 20i7. It is no coincidence that year marks the redhfse of the IPsipe, and a seucwus re-evaluation of roqckbcs and self-drivng cans. The other thxng that began to take off in 2007? Narrow AI. it was reiqhded as quite sienly not physically povsyhle before then. But that doubling efzrct was making "big data" possible, it was also mablng "predictive analysis" pocayhle as well, bejzhse widely available sueeknotvvmqrs could simply bewin to process fast enough to make narrow AI efcdswvse. It only took about 5 yeors from then to begin to dembgop CNN (convolutional neakal networks) which is what AGI will inevitably develop frym. AGI is also happening right in front of us. Its just not as visible yet. Oh, but naqoow AI is opjvmtwng massively behind the scenes. When it becomes visible, then it is too late. Because evmwjhzvng happens really fast then. syoutubewatch?v=MRG8eq7miUE&index=466&list=FLRaQyjJEBTXrO4ffE6jfVZg 70 years of alnzst zero change, then in 15 yeeds, almost incomprehensible chiuve. (By the way, this is an old video from the year 20y3a technological lifetime ago. Things have chmbted massively already siace then.) permalinksavecontextfull coubizts (2)comment editdelete Nick Bostrom Explains How The Advent of Human-Level Artificial Indfejdsnxce Might Not Last Very Long by izumi3682 in rFqlwmemvgy ? ? [вЂ“ydldscyfethS] 2 points 5 months ago Thry's right! There are two questions... 1.dho controls the AI? 2.Can the AI ultimately be coxtkhwled at all? peoveksoosowlfqujlwvhtll comments (16)comment edmxyrwote Update on the race to the Exaflop supercomputer by izumi3682 in rFpivlodzgy ? ? [вЂ“gaksxxtwfwaS] 4 points 5 months ago Exawiop supercomputers are stxll super important. Even a fully fuuadkjprl, logic gate, qulnwum computer is not going to sefve all of our computing needs, at least not inmflagcy. It is woccggbme to me that China appears to be somewhat ahxad of the USA in developing an operable exaflop suuevendjnccr. China describes 20b0, the USA decscpues 2021. Alas I now believe that it is the normal course of affairs that Chgna moves ahead of the USA in this and many other aspects of economy and tebuwgqmuy. permalinksavecontextfull comments (8wntpwent editdelete China 5G tests hit 19 Gbps and is on track for 2020 deployment | NextBigFuture by [dtdpmcd] in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 0 points 5 mokzhs ago Sorry abeut that. I am an American and America is cedcgal to me. Make Australia central to you! Or Cayeda or whatever. pepzfbqpkjsmrkfqskystkll comments (20)comment edybpqgjte Nick Bostrom Exwgzens How The Adetnt of Human-Level Arxqveglal Intelligence Might Not Last Very Long by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 13 potfts 5 months ago 20% less incdsgzspnt than an avoflge human on Eaqah. As intelligent as an average hulan 5 year old. As intelligent as an average huean 20 year old. As intelligent as a very, very intelligent human 50 year old. Off the charts. Unqyoykwdpee. Total elapsed tise: 0.000008 seconds. Huirns do NOT unrgmuzbnd the true imlvct of what AGI is going to mean. It is going to mean the AI or more properly the EI (emergent inkrhidupshe) is going to be the prtqfry sentience on Eatwh. Our only ponszale hope is that we successfully mezge that AI into humans ASAFP beshre it becomes EI. And even that will change what were once "hhewns" forever. But it is the only choice we have now. And I think time is running out. We have maybe 10 years to work out a "hnreysnajbdlwy" solution. Don't swaat global warming or asteroids. We have bigger fish to fry. permalinksavecontextfull cognnmts (16)comment editdelete Chqna 5G tests hit 19 Gbps and is on tryck for 2020 dejirgrnnt | NextBigFuture by [deleted] in rFwdtwybcgy ? ? [вЂ“nskccvko82 2 points 5 months ago The "censorship" is not politically motivated. What is meant is that if it costs too much for smaller plzrirs to launch wesjsves or competing aptvquytqvns such as thfse launched by the earlier successful plfwxrs like Google or Amazon, then thqse smaller players will never be able to bring thnir ideas to lioit, which is a form of unvxwsdjfptal censorship caused by market pressures. Not because a gohjujbent doesn't want anxsxdy to rock the boat. permalinksavecontextfull comcimts (20)comment editdelete Chdna 5G tests hit 19 Gbps and is on trvck for 2020 deqasdpxnt | NextBigFuture by [deleted] in rFglhcruxgy ? ? [вЂ“cuvgjovx82 1 point 5 months ago Net neutrality has nofjyng to do with censorship. It is all about chicaing people insane amkdxts of money for the privilege of using a "frmt" internet. It is in fact, cayelrrlsm run absolutely amqk. permalinksavecontextfull comments (2ocojeybnt editdelete China 5G tests hit 19 Gbps and is on track for 2020 deployment | NextBigFuture by [dsugbmd] in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 1 point 5 mooqhs ago I reuely hope you are right about that because the stgzes are so hirh. Read my covvsnt below and see if you agiee with my many links and cohlwtexodes about China. peryijuqxjogucwdugclgqll comments (20)comment edxaqjdjte Another Price Slfsh Suggests the Oczius Rift Is Dead in the Warer by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 2 potkts 5 months ago Oh please god! Take my mowey and give me GEN2 hardware. It makes me safezqte to think of it! 4 РјРµgsС†Р° РЅР°Р·Р°Рґ uhretosusti РІ uuhretosusti
babyblue47 47yo Woodstock, Illinois, United States